Editorial: Fighting childhood obesity worth the toil Feb 2011

Editorial: Fighting childhood obesity worth the toil

Published: Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 10A

The immediate and long-term costs of childhood obesity, for individual kids and for society, deserve more attention from families, nonprofits and, yes, even government.

Sacramento City Councilman Kevin McCarty is making it a personal crusade. That's welcome; the fight needs a local champion.

In the next few weeks, McCarty plans to ask his fellow council members to make Sacramento the largest of some 65 California cities to pass a resolution joining the Healthy Eating Active Living Cities Campaign.

He says he'll work to put more community gardens at schools – like those at Tahoe and Camellia elementaries – both to teach students about food and to grow healthier fare for residents. He also wants to look at banning sodas from vending machines at city libraries and other facilities, along the lines of the landmark 2005 state law that banned sodas from schools.

Most controversially, he wants to explore a local tax on sodas to help pay for school physical fitness and city recreation programs, which he points out have been decimated by three years of budget cuts.

Last Thursday, the latest bill for a statewide soda tax – a penny per ounce – was introduced in the Assembly. It would generate an estimated $1.7 billion a year for state, school and local efforts to fight childhood obesity. It would add 20 cents to the cost of the typical 20-ounce bottle that costs $1.25 out of the machine. A statewide poll released this month found Californians increasingly concerned about childhood obesity; more than half supported a soda tax.

Because the bill would need a two-thirds majority in the Legislature, a local soda tax may actually have a better chance of passage.

Still, McCarty expects a "huge uphill battle" against well-financed opposition from the soft drink industry. It has defeated many recent efforts, arguing that it would be unfairly singled out.

While overeating and lack of exercise in general are to blame, public health advocates persuasively point to studies showing that soda consumption has increased markedly and accounts for nearly half the average increase in calories.

McCarty is pointing a possible soda tax toward the 2012 ballot, which could also be crowded with a parcel tax for youth programs and an assessment for parks maintenance. Since they are all somewhat interrelated, McCarty pledges to work with advocates and fellow council members to come up with the right mix of tax hikes to put before voters. A soda tax may not end up making the most sense, but it ought to be part of the conversation.

 

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

www.sacbee.com/MAI/3419687/E/preview" height="1" width="1"/>

hide comments

Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …

Thanks! Close

Showing 1-10 of 31 comments

  • SP1041 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Are you guys really complaining this much about the cost of a soda going from $1.25 to $1.45? Really? And you say the problem is with parents, did you ever think that they may be ignorant or misinformed about childhood nutrition? If a child has a parent that doesn't give them a healthy diet is he or she just sh*t outta luck?
  • kat61969 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I do think the school gardens are a great idea. It is science in action. Hands on learning like that and pride of ownership into the garden goes a long way to help kids learn about healthy foods. This garden should not take much money. We got ours started for about $100 for wood to make boxes, soil, and seeds. It should be a parent involvement thing too. I think there are parents that don't know where food comes from.
  • kat61969 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I disagree that it's the government's job. Parents should be responsible for taking proper care of their kids. In this proper care effort, they should make sure their kids are getting adequate physical activity time, enough sleep, and proper nutrition. The government just can't legislate good parenting. No matter how much money they throw at it.
  • pjbct 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Come on Bee, give me a break. It's the parents' responsibility to raise a healthy child and not our nanny state. That's what you should be editorializing about!!!
  • BigBill48 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    The old liberal big government Bee just continues to want to tax us more for these Utopian schemes
  • Buckre 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    This won't reduce childhood obesity. What it will do is play upon the "hot issue of the day" (obesity), and convince suckers that this tax is in their best interests. If video games were determined to be the primary source of obesity he would probably suggest we tax every game too. It's a revenue thing, nothing more. If this state tax is really able to raise $1.7 billion a year and really will be used to "fight childhood obesity", we could suck the fat right out of them through liposuction and still have enough to buy them smaller clothes.
  • hpbromine 3 comments collapsed Collapse Expand
    OH, PLEASE!!!! The city has not adressed its ongoing budget deficit during the last 3 years, even though it has raised taxes and fees and its residents lack adequate fire and police protection and the Bee thinks that childhood obesity is a higher priority than thos issues. That's nonsense. McCarty was elected to ensure that his contituents have adequate city services, not to get the city involved in feel-good issues that the city has no business getting involved in. McCarty is clearly following Kevin Johnson's lead, embarking upon 'initiatives' that endow him with no responsibility or accountability inmstead of dsoing the job he was elected to do. Frankly, its impossible to not be fed up with the incompetenmtce and arrogance of Sacramento city government. It seems to have forgotten the most basic fact; it's exists to ensure the welfare of all city residents, not just its own. McCarty is making himself look foolish and so is the Bee. Shouldn't the Bee be clamoring for a balanced city budget without a budget deficit and adequate fire and police protection, as a minimum, rather than encouraging the city to play nanny to folks that eat too much?
  • Buckre 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Amen this time!
  • loomisresident 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Well, I must say we're on the same side of the fence in this issue.
  • californiacitizen 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    There is a no-cost solution to childhood obesity and it is called the PARENT. Say no to your child and fix nutritrious meals. Absolutely no cost to the taxpayer.
Please see and share.

Tags: Dignity, Environments.Acceptance, Hope, Integrity, Volunteers, are, food, healthy, loss, needed.Obesity#weight, More…obesity

Views: 10

Reply to This

© 2013   Created by Paul Murphy.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service








Facebook Badges
Tweets by @fatpeacetalks
By Business Card Designs
ButtonsHut.comFacebook Badge